|
The Courts act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative
to perpetrate the income tax fraud and deny the Constitutional
protections of Due Process and Separation of Powers.
The
Largest Fraud On Planet Earth
- Admit that 26 U.S.C. § 7203 imposes a penalty for the
crime of willful failure to file a tax return.
See 26 U.S.C. § 7203
Exhibit 150
- Admit that Congress enacted 26 U.S.C. 7203 in August,
1954.
See 26 U.S.C. 7203, credits and historical notes
Exhibit 150
- Admit that the United States Supreme Court in South
Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998)
stated: “[w]e assume that Congress is aware of
existing law when it passes legislation.”
See South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522
U.S. 329 (1998)
Exhibit 151
- Admit that Congress enacted 44 U.S.C. § 3512 in 1980.
See 44 U.S.C. § 3512, credits and historical notes
Exhibit 152
- Admit that 44 U.S.C. § 3512 states that:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing
to comply with a collection of information that
is subject to this subchapter if--
(1) the collection of information does not display
a valid control number assigned by the Director
in accordance with this subchapter; or
(2) the agency fails to inform the person who
is to respond to the collection of information
that such person is not required to respond
to the collection of information unless it
displays a valid control number.
(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised
in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise
at any time during the agency administrative process
or judicial action applicable thereto.
See 44 U.S.C. § 3512
Exhibit 152
- Admit that United States Supreme Court Chief Judge Taney
in 1863 protested the constitutionality of the income
tax as applied to him.
See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245, 257 (1920)
Exhibit 153
- Admit that United States District Court Judge Walter Evans,
in 1919 protested the constitutionality of the income
tax as applied to him.
See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920)
Exhibit 153
- Admit that United States Circuit Court Judge Joseph W.
Woodrough in 1936 protested the constitutionality of
the income tax as applied to him.
See O’Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
Exhibit 154
- Admit that United States District Court Judge Terry J.
Hatter and other federal court judges in the 1980s protested
the constitutionality of taxes as applied to them.
See United States v. Hatter, 121 S.Ct. 1782 (2001)
Exhibit 155
- Admit that even in criminal cases where a loss of freedom
can be the result, American citizens who are not judges
are precluded by the federal judiciary, and with the
express approval and consent of the Department of Justice
and U.S. Attorney, from arguing the constitutionality
of the income tax as applied to them.
See U.S. v. Farber, 630 F2d 569, 573, 8th Cir.
1980
Exhibit 156
- Admit that the Executive and Judicial branches of the
federal government label Americans who challenge the
legality of the federal income tax as “tax protesters.”
(Department of Justice Criminal Tax Manual, “Tax Protestor”
section.)
Exhibit 157
- Admit that United States Supreme Court Chief Judge Taney
submitted his protest in a letter to the Secretary of
the Treasury.
See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245, 257 (1920)
Exhibit 153
- Admit that letters of protest written to the Secretary
of the Treasury by American Citizens are used by the
Executive branch of government, and accepted by the Judicial
branch of government, as proof of income tax evasion
and conspiracy against those who write the letters.
- Admit that if an individual required to make a return
under Section 6012(a) of the Internal Revenue Code fails
to make the required return, the statutory procedure
authorized by Congress for the determination of the amount
of tax due is the “deficiency” procedure set forth at
subchapter B of Chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code,
commencing at Section 6211.
See 26 U.S.C. §§ 63, 6012(a), and 6211
Exhibit 086,
020,
159
- Admit that if an individual required to make a return
under Section 6012(a) of the Internal Revenue Code fails
to make the required return, Congress mandated at Section
6212 that the individual is required to be served a “notice
of deficiency” setting forth the amount of tax imposed
by Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code per Section
6211 of the Internal Revenue Code.
See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6012(a), 6211, and 6212
Exhibit 020, 159, 160
|