HOME

ABOUT
KEYNOTE ADDRESS
HIGHLIGHTS
  ORIGINAL SOUND TRACK
  LIABILITY
  RIGHT TO LABOR
  JURISDICTION
  FIFTH AMENDMENT
  THE COURTS ARE CLOSED
  FIRST AMENDMENT
  SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT
  PRA AND APA
  IMF
  WORD INCLUDES
  FOURTH AMENDMENT
  DUE PROCESS
  IRS FRAUD
  SUBSTITUTE RETURNS
  TAXABLE SOURCES

 The Courts Are Closed

The Courts act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative to perpetrate the income tax fraud and deny the Constitutional protections of Due Process and Separation of Powers.

Watch the Video Testimony
Read the Transcript
       
       
Section Summary    
Question & Evidence Overview    
Findings & Conclusions    
 
 
Questions 232 - 256

The Largest Fraud On Planet Earth

  1. Admit that 26 U.S.C. § 7203 imposes a penalty for the crime of willful failure to file a tax return. 

    See 26 U.S.C. § 7203
    Exhibit 150

  2. Admit that Congress enacted 26 U.S.C. 7203 in August, 1954. 

    See 26 U.S.C. 7203, credits and historical notes
    Exhibit 150

  3. Admit that the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998) stated:  “[w]e assume that Congress is aware of existing law when it passes legislation.”

    See South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998)                                Exhibit 151

  4. Admit that Congress enacted 44 U.S.C. § 3512 in 1980. 

    See 44 U.S.C. § 3512, credits and historical notes
    Exhibit 152

  5. Admit that 44 U.S.C. § 3512 states that:

    (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that is subject to this subchapter if--

(1) the collection of information does not display a valid control number assigned by the Director in accordance with this subchapter;  or

(2) the agency fails to inform the person who is to respond to the collection of information that such person is not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a valid control number.

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.

See 44 U.S.C. § 3512
Exhibit 152

  1. Admit that United States Supreme Court Chief Judge Taney in 1863 protested the constitutionality of the income tax as applied to him. 

    See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245, 257 (1920)
    Exhibit 153

  2. Admit that United States District Court Judge Walter Evans, in 1919 protested the constitutionality of the income tax as applied to him. 

    See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920)
    Exhibit 153

  3. Admit that United States Circuit Court Judge Joseph W. Woodrough in 1936 protested the constitutionality of the income tax as applied to him.

    See O’Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
    Exhibit 154

  4. Admit that United States District Court Judge Terry J. Hatter and other federal court judges in the 1980s protested the constitutionality of taxes as applied to them. 

    See United States v. Hatter, 121 S.Ct. 1782 (2001)
    Exhibit 155

  5. Admit that even in criminal cases where a loss of freedom can be the result, American citizens who are not judges are precluded by the federal judiciary, and with the express approval and consent of the Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney, from arguing the constitutionality of the income tax as applied to them.

    See U.S. v. Farber, 630 F2d 569, 573, 8th Cir. 1980
    Exhibit 156

  6. Admit that the Executive and Judicial branches of the federal government label Americans who challenge the legality of the federal income tax as “tax protesters.” (Department of Justice Criminal Tax Manual, “Tax Protestor” section.)

    Exhibit 157

  7. Admit that United States Supreme Court Chief Judge Taney submitted his protest in a letter to the Secretary of the Treasury. 

    See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245, 257 (1920)
    Exhibit 153

  8. Admit that letters of protest written to the Secretary of the Treasury by American Citizens are used by the Executive branch of government, and accepted by the Judicial branch of government, as proof of income tax evasion and conspiracy against those who write the letters. 

  1. Admit that if an individual required to make a return under Section 6012(a) of the Internal Revenue Code fails to make the required return, the statutory procedure authorized by Congress for the determination of the amount of tax due is the “deficiency” procedure set forth at subchapter B of Chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code, commencing at Section 6211. 

    See 26 U.S.C. §§ 63, 6012(a), and 6211
    Exhibit 086, 020, 159

  2. Admit that if an individual required to make a return under Section 6012(a) of the Internal Revenue Code fails to make the required return, Congress mandated at Section 6212 that the individual is required to be served a “notice of deficiency” setting forth the amount of tax imposed by Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code per Section 6211 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

    See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6012(a), 6211, and 6212
    Exhibit 020, 159, 160

 

 
 
Copyright 2002.  We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc. in association with Family Guardian Fellowship.  All Rights Reserved.

No part may be rebroadcast, retransmitted, or copied without the express written permission of We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc.