TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The list of questions below is intended to be used in a deposition or Due
Process Hearing with the IRS or your state taxing authorities. It is
derived and adapted from the ![]() At the end of our version of the questions appears a number, for instance "WTP #256" means We The People Question #256 from the hearing held 27-28FEB2002 in Washington D.C. These numbers are included so that if you have the CD-ROM or video tape of that proceeding obtainable from the We The People Website, you can correlate our question with theirs.
INDEX
WHY ARE THESE QUESTIONS IMPORTANT AND EVEN NECESSARY?
“This case involves a cancer in our body politic [democracy, greed and wickedness and covetousness of our elected and appointed servants on a massive scale, see James 1:19-27 and Psalms 94:16-23]. It is a measure of the disease which afflicts us...Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our Heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government off the backs of the people. The Bill of Rights was added to keep the precincts of belief and expression, of the press, of political and social activities free from surveillance. The Bill of Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official eavesdroppers away from Assemblies of People. The aim was to allow men to be free and independent to assert their rights against government. There can be no influence more paralyzing of that objective than Army [government] surveillance. When an intelligence officer looks over every nonconformist's shoulder in the library, or walks invisibly by his side in a picket line, or infiltrates his club [or forces him to submit an income tax return and then scrutinizes it for personal information or illegal activity], the America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard around the world no longer is [408 U.S. 1, 29] cast in the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian [Communist!] image, depicted in Appendix III to this opinion.” Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1; 92 S.Ct. 2318 (1972) _________________________________________________________________
"We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice [greed], ambition, revenge, or gallantry [debauchery], would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --John Adams, 2nd President.
"He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy." Prov. 28:13
[COMMENT: If a federal judge tries to put a protective order on you or refuses to admit evidence during trial related to asking these questions of the government, then they are covering sins and will be condemned by God according to His law above. See also Joshua 7:11-26 and John 3:18-21 . Furthermore, judges or U.S. Attorneys who would advocate suppressing this information are violating the intent of the First Amendment Petition Clause, which requires the government to allow members of our society to petition for redress of wrongs by the government in order to keep the government accountable to the sovereign people that they serve and are subordinate to. The wrongs can't be redressed unless and until they can first be discovered and exposed, and especially to juries. Advocacy by judges, federal courts, and U.S. attorneys in encouraging discovery using these questions is therefore the first and and most important requisite towards fulfilling the requirements and intent of a First Amendment petition for redress of grievances. It is also a necessary prerequisite to them fulfilling the legal fiduciary duty they have to the American public as described in sections 2.1 and 4.1 of our Great IRS Hoax book. ]
ORDERING This set of questions makes a good reliance defense. A reliance defense is a package of evidence you send in with your LAST tax return to indicate and explain why you believe you are no longer liable for the federal income tax and why you choose to no longer file returns. In the package, you ask the government to refute the evidence and tell them that unless and until they do, you will no longer file or pay income taxes. You can order your copy for your "reliance defense" from: EVIDENCE SOURCES:
QUESTIONERS AT THE HEARING INCLUDED:
WITNESSES WHO APPEARED AT THE HISTORIC HEARING INCLUDED:
PROBLEM/CORRUPTED EVIDENCE:
|
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship |
Last revision: November 16, 2011 07:10 PM |
This private system is NOT subject to monitoring |